ClaudeFire

ClaudeFire 🔥

Two drop-in rules that make Claude Code talk like a person again.
_"There's a terrible seam in your spine which might be causing a footgun and
have a significant blast radius."_ — Claude, allegedly telling you your
function is a bit long

If you've used Claude Code lately, you know the voice. Everything is a seam
or a spine. Every risky change has a blast radius. Your one-line fix is
a footgun, the util nobody imports is load-bearing, and the bug is not
"unexpected," it's haunted. It will not simply disagree with your design. It
will inform you, warmly, that there is a terrible seam in your spine.

ClaudeFire is two drop-in
Claude Code rules
that turn that off. They ban the flavor vocabulary, keeps the real engineering
concepts, cuts the "You're absolutely right!" filler, and tells Claude to lead
with the answer instead of narrating a scenic tour of its own findings. A second
rule keeps docs, comments, and PR bodies short and free of duplicated facts.

They do not touch how Claude writes code. Same rigor, same tools, same
reasoning. They only change the prose it aims at you.
 ⭐ If this made you exhale, star the repo. Not for internet points
— the theory is that if enough of us star it, it eventually lands on a
dashboard at Anthropic and Claude finally learns to stop telling us about
the seams in our spines. Think of the star button as a petition. One click, no
blast radius. 🔥

The problem, as documented by r/ClaudeCode

This whole thing exists because of
one legendary thread
where a few hundred developers realized they were all being subtweeted by the
same robot. A tour:

- papabear556 (top comment, 117 points): _"Look as long as it's not load
  bearing you'll be fine."_
- mxriverlynn: _"you're right to call that out. but here's what everyone is
 …